Friday, August 11, 2006
THE COMING OF THE VIRTUAL NATION
Adrienne Redd, writing at Conversation Base Blog:
"It evokes science fiction to envision voluntary alliances networked across vast distances which challenge traditional nation-states, but it is already happening. Globalization, terrorism and events of the past five days, the past five weeks and the past five decades suggest that the nation-state may be undergoing the greatest shift since its emergence in Europe. Many of these pressures on the nation-state arise from what we could call virtual nations. The established nation-states must respond to these emergent entities or face the consequences."
Read Adrienne's post in full here. ¶ 7:33 PM
Adrienne Redd, writing at Conversation Base Blog:
"It evokes science fiction to envision voluntary alliances networked across vast distances which challenge traditional nation-states, but it is already happening. Globalization, terrorism and events of the past five days, the past five weeks and the past five decades suggest that the nation-state may be undergoing the greatest shift since its emergence in Europe. Many of these pressures on the nation-state arise from what we could call virtual nations. The established nation-states must respond to these emergent entities or face the consequences."
Read Adrienne's post in full here. ¶ 7:33 PM
Comments:
<< Home
John Urry's work on Global Complexity and my own work on Panarchy investigates the coming network culture.
It's not that nation-states have to respond to the new networks, but rather, that nation-states need to die peacably and let panarchy thrive.
Unfortunately, that's not likely to happen.
It's not that nation-states have to respond to the new networks, but rather, that nation-states need to die peacably and let panarchy thrive.
Unfortunately, that's not likely to happen.
# posted by 
: Monday, 14 August, 2006
: Monday, 14 August, 2006
Hey Paul,
"It's not that nation-states have to respond to the new networks, but rather, that nation-states need to die peacably and let panarchy thrive."
Have you read _Shield of Achilles_ by Philip Bobbitt ? I find the transition/paradigm shift/evolution to his network-friendly and nimble Market-state a functional possibility for the nation-state.
And considering that in 2006 we still have vestigal remains of aristocracies and monarchies in corners of the world, the chances of the nation-state vanishing, peacefully or otherwise, are dim.
Losing some relevancy is another matter.
Post a Comment
"It's not that nation-states have to respond to the new networks, but rather, that nation-states need to die peacably and let panarchy thrive."
Have you read _Shield of Achilles_ by Philip Bobbitt ? I find the transition/paradigm shift/evolution to his network-friendly and nimble Market-state a functional possibility for the nation-state.
And considering that in 2006 we still have vestigal remains of aristocracies and monarchies in corners of the world, the chances of the nation-state vanishing, peacefully or otherwise, are dim.
Losing some relevancy is another matter.
<< Home
